Subject: [boost] [fusion] accumulate vs. std::accumulate
From: Christoph Heindl (christoph.heindl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-10 12:13:05
I'm currently confronted with an issue raised before  on this list:
boost::fusion::accumulate takes its arguments in reverse order
compared to std::accumulate. The issue is still marked as 'new' on
What are the chances to have this issue fixed for the next release?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk