Subject: Re: [boost] [random] seeding with arbitrary integers
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-22 13:24:49
John Maddock wrote:
>> seed will work as advertised. Regardless of the outcome
>> of this discussion, I will make sure that the exact behavior
>> is documented.
> I think that's the key here: if the documentation clearly states that
> the seed is treated modulo N or whatever then that would be OK for me.
> Whatever the status quo is unacceptable given that seeding with
> unspecified values (from time() or some other non-deterministic
> device) is so commonplace. Throwing an exception for out-of-range
> values might work, but as pointed out the exception would occur so
> infrequently in practice that your just creating another source of
> Robert, what if the docs clearly stated that "Safe values for the
> seed are 0-N, values outside this range get wrapped within it via
> modulo N arithmetic, therefore different seeds can result in the same
> of random values if one of those seeds is outside of the safe range."
> Or something like that ;-)
Fine by me. In fact, all of you have considered it more than I
have so I'm very happy to defer to your judgment on this case.
I just reacted to the general idea of fixing stuff up under the covers.
It turns out that I just happened to need a quick and idiot-proof
number generator so I used boost.random.
I think the motivation for my original complaint was:
"uh - oh, do have actually have to know something about
random number generation to use this library?" If so, I've
got a problem. I want it to "just work". Being idiot-proof
was a pre-condition in this circumstance. I realize that
satisifying such a pre-condition is the motivation for the
proposed solution and I'm OK with that. But when this
is done "silently", it can create problems which are devilishly
hard to find.
Also, I found the documentation not good enough in general. I did
make it work but it wasn't as easy to use as I would have hoped.
Of course I could make the same criticism for many or most
Of course at the root of the problem is the desire to use
facilities that I have neither the knowledge nor time to implement
myself. But that's what I use libraries for - so they almost have
to be idiot proof to be useful to me.
Just one man's opinion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk