Subject: Re: [boost] Temporary objects
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-30 16:08:52
on 30.10.2009 at 12:57
Thomas Klimpel wrote :
> For the proposed rvalue-reference, the type "B&&"
> can implicitly be converted to "A&&", and I have the impression that
> this can lead to behavior even worse than slicing.
by the way such reasoning can really put that proposal on ice and
we'll not see it in the new standard
on the other hand all responsibility can be laid on users' shoulders
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk