Subject: Re: [boost] The C++ Post-Processor
From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-01 14:57:42
On 10/18/2009 08:06 AM, Christian Schladetsch wrote:
> D is indeed interesting. But I wonder how far C++ can be taken with M4/C++
> before it breaks.
...which seems to imply it isn't already broken. (Sorry, couldn't
resist. ;-) )
>> I wish C++ templates were like D templates..
> I think we all wish C++ was something other than it is. Some more than
> But what can be done with Boost.Wave to make a C+++?
C++++ ?? Now that sounds like a scary idea.
> And, is there any serious effort to make a formal and correct C++
> interpreter? It can of course be done. I will argue that it has to be done
> sooner than later if C++ is to remain relevant as an actively used (as
> opposed to necessarily maintained) language going forward.
I fully disagree. C++, as every language, serves particular domains.
There are other domains, much better served by other languages. Cramming
more programming paradigms into C++ doesn't (necessarily) make it a
I'm a big fan of multi-paradigm design (in C++). But I also recognize
the limits of C++ (and all other languages I speak / use, for that
matter), and thus I also like hybrid programming (e.g.
Instead of attempting to put more features into C++, let's try to fix
the existing ones.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk