Re: [boost] Temporary objects

Subject: Re: [boost] Temporary objects
From: DE (satan66613_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-03 13:18:56

on 02.11.2009 at 20:52
 Steven Watanabe wrote :
>> i mean that in an example like
>>
>>     type foo(const type &to_be_processed)
>>     {
>>       type ret;
>>       //processing
>>       return ret;
>>     }
>>
>> semantics of the copy constructor does matter
>> here nrvo likely not to take place (actually it should NOT take place)
>>   
> This is exactly the case where NRVO should happen.
> (NRVO stands for named return value optimization as
> opposed to RVO which is for temporaries)
well, then my question is: _will_ it happen?

-- 
Pavel