|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 18:49:32
joel wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> I would remove -pedantic, but otherwise, it's a very good idea.
>> Unfortunately,
>> recent discussion left me with the impression that few folks care.
>>
> They def. should care. I am all for this proposal too.
I've never been a bjam expert, but what is the bjam flag that
switches on warnings? On my part, I could just switch it on
every time I do local testing.
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net http://www.facebook.com/djowel Meet me at BoostCon http://www.boostcon.com/home http://www.facebook.com/boostcon
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk