Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-04 20:45:36
Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> > However this will not address the issue at hand, which is that people
> > who use higher warning levels will see tons of warnings. A better
> > attitude is http://www.zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq35.
> This is muchly tongue in cheeky. You can build their code with high
> warning levels and don't get warnings. zlib is useful and clean. Well
> written code. I like it.
So you are probably just talking about compiling warning free on gcc. But other compilers give much more silly warnings, and there are many different compilers out there. Just accept that this is not tongue in cheeky.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk