Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-05 12:07:36
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Simonson, Lucanus J
> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 4:09 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
> If we are going to have an official boost policy
> for warnings we need a list of flags for each major compiler that we can all
Previous attempts to get agreement on this have not been very successful one
man's meat proved another poison ;-)
I concluded that every author had to do his own thing for his own warnings - but
do his best to get rid of them 'locally' to his module without inflicting his
choice on everyone. Not all compiler have this fine-grained enough mechanism,
but then the info in the build info should allow users to add their own choice
of 'not-useful' warnings.
is a first go at this.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk