Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 00:01:58
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:36 PM, troy d. straszheim <troy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Feeling shamed into redoing it, I wrote a script that assumes that if file
> boost/X/F.hpp includes file boost/Y/f.hpp, then project X depends on Y. For
> toplevel files, if a file boost/K.hpp exists as well as a directory boost/K,
> then an include of boost/K.hpp is a dependency on K. for files boost/R.hpp
> where no subdirectory R exists, the dependency is either determined via an
> incomplete hand-constructed list of mappings from file to project, or the
> dependency is on special project UNCATEGORIZED. If a file is found that
> includes a file that does not exist, the dependency is on project MISSING.
That's pretty useful.
X -> R.hpp
X -> UNCATEGORIZED
same with MISSING.
ie no loss of information in that case. At least for the text version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk