Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 00:40:43
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Q: Who would want to know that boost::exception_ptr's destructor is not
>> A: Only someone who wants to build a polymorphic type hierarchy with
>> boost::exception_ptr as a base, calling delete through a
>> boost::exception_ptr base pointer.
>> So, exception_ptr's destructor should be virtual to keep *that* guy
>> out of trouble?
> Emil, can you please silence the compiler somehow?
I had silenced it already, I believe. That's what triggered that
particular rant. :)
I see that your patch deals with the warnings better. For now, I will
leave my commit from earlier today, but probably after the release is
out I'll fix it your way.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk