Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 02:50:45
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Sid Sacek <ssacek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> But I will say we still did it - ie we still found it valuable to get
> to zero warnings.
I read your post carefully and it seems like fixing the warnings
didn't uncover any bugs and at least for one warning the fix
introduced bugs; +0 for the former, -1 for the latter leaves me
wondering what value do you find in fixing the warnings.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk