Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-08 18:19:54
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> Hence I'm surprised by your contention that it's not a valid argument
>>> by Emil. As it seems like a valid concern to me, as presented by
>>> Emil. So perhaps you should consider asking the VC team to publicly
>>> comment about it instead of arguing about the gossip'ness of Emil's
>> I believe that, driven by caution, there is nothing wrong with asking
>> for source of such information, for confirmation.
>> Otherwise, it's nothing wrong to reserve rights to have second thoughts
>> about something that have been said. Of course, it's nothing personal.
> Hm, yes, of course... But my convern was with your contention that
> Emil's quote from STL is gossip. Or did I not understand your response
> to Emil?
Certainly, I didn't call Emil's quote from Stephan as gossip and
I've taken it seriously.
I just made a supposition that it could be a gossip if further
details are not given, but Emil's provided details, so everything
has been clarified now.
> After all we are talking about Stephan T. Lavavej, Visual C++
> Libraries Developer.
> Now-confusedly-yours :-\
I'm sorry for confusions.
I hope it clarifies my point.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk