Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-09 11:26:44

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Time for another bug sprint (after 1.41 ships)?"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [boost] Time for another bug sprint (after 1.41 ships)?"
In reply to: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
Behalf Of
> Emil Dotchevski
> Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 6:58 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > warnings=all
> > in the appropriate jamfile defaults?
>
> Shouldn't the default on each individual compiler be the default?

No - I don't think it should - because Boost is aiming to be as Portable and C++
Standard compliant as possible.

What *users* chose is entirely their choice - and the default for their compiler
would be entirely sensible.

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal, UK   LA8 8AB
+44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Time for another bug sprint (after 1.41 ships)?"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [boost] Time for another bug sprint (after 1.41 ships)?"
In reply to: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Help needed in fixing warnings"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk