Subject: Re: [boost] GGL Extensions
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-10 18:54:36
Tom Brinkman wrote:
>>> The GGL team proposes an extension model, very similar to what is
>>> used by GIL.
> I'm not sure that the extensions proposal worked very well for GIL.
> I'm not sure why.
This is interesting. Perhaps GIL maintainers could share their opinion?
> Probably it was too ambitious.
I've started to lurk around GIL extensions fairly recently,
so I'm not able to judge.
> Initially, just try encourage a small group of interested developers
> to work with you on extensions. When that number becomes too large,
> than start thinking about a more formalized system.
> If people see that there are a couple of really cool extensions that
> were intergrated, it might just encourage others to add extensions as
Perhaps, in future, it would make sense to maintain two sets of extensions:
- internal or built-in tools specific to various domains
but mature enough to have them included as part of the library
- external - sort of incubator, place for more exotic tools,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk