Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-11 13:24:14

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] Is anyone maintaining Boost.IOStreams?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"

John Maddock wrote:
>
>
> We would normally leave that to the library author... unless he's AWOL?
>
>

I don't know, but i opened #1507 2 years ago and and the authour hasn't
commented on it.

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Official-warnings-policy--tp26200658p26306120.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"
Previous message: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] Is anyone maintaining Boost.IOStreams?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk