Subject: Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-12 11:51:05
>> > Indeed, Variant shouldn't suppress the warning, but wasn't the
>> > original issue because a test was triggering it? IOW, it is the
>> > test code that should work around or suppress the warning.
>> This is what the test tests. If it "works around the warning"
>> it is no
>> longer a test. You may as well remove it, which will also silence the
> The test tests that Variant produces a warning?
No the test verifies that:
variant = type-convertible-to-actual-type-in-variant;
works as expected.
The warning is a byproduct of the fact that the type stored in the variant
is a short, and the type convertible to it is an int.
Hopefully that's clear-ish :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk