Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-13 19:37:31

Barend Gehrels wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>> The bottom line is that when the OGC conventions already force me to
>> accept confusing names, it would at least be nice to know how I can
>> verify that these are indeed OGC names. What are the reference
>> documents I have to read to learn this?
> There is a new table here:
> which summarizes which is OGC and which is not, and clarify names and
> possible name changes.


In the section "OGC functions, not planned", it lists functions like
X, Y, Z, and M but actually it might be valid to consider those
accessors get<D> and set<D> as equivalents (for D in range [0, 3])

In other words, I would consider that GGL does provide some sort of
equivalent of these four OGC functions.

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,
Charter Member of OSGeo,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at