Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-16 06:05:53
Thanks, we were happy to read your review, and understand your concerns.
We want to clarify one point, also because there were more remarks on this.
> I think the stated scope of the library (generic computational
> geometry) differs from the scope of what has been implemented (generic
> 2d floating point GIS focused geometry).
The word "generic" in our name denotes generic programming. It is a
generic library on geometry. Most libraries on GIS or geometry are not
based on generic programming. So that was why we choose for this name.
This might indicate indeed a generic library on generic geometry, and we
want to support many branches; but actual name is derived from GP.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk