Re: [boost] GGL Review

Subject: Re: [boost] GGL Review
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-16 11:01:52

AMDG

Barend Gehrels wrote:
> Iff we are accepted, we want to move to BoostBooks. If not, we will 
> (probably) select something else, e.g. a Wiki. Because the library is 
> large, we could not do this before review and take the risk to move 
> after rejection to something else. We know that Doxygen is not 
> perfect. What IS perfect in Doxygen is the integration between small 
> code samples and documentation. All the samples you see do really 
> compile. They are extracted automatically from sample-sources 
> (included in the distribution). We want to keep this feature so on 
> selecting another doc system we have to inventorize the possibilities 
> (tips welcome).

Quickbook has a way to extract fragments from source code
http://tinyurl.com/ygjn8oh

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe