Re: [boost] [new Warnings policy] MS C4180 on the Maintenance Guidelines

Subject: Re: [boost] [new Warnings policy] MS C4180 on the Maintenance Guidelines
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-17 13:37:44

   Paul A. Bristow wrote:

Patrick Horgan

   First, I have to say, amazing job, and amazing reference.  I don't believe
   that there's anything else like this on the web.
    

:-)

[1]https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/Guidelines/MaintenanceGuidelines

now updated using your suggestions.

Is this better?

   Hard to be much better than it was!  Still a couple of caveats.  I'd like to
   see
   C4996    mention that POSIX has not deprecated these please.  The Visual C++
   message is, perhaps, deceptive and people may fear that they are using
   things that are no longer part of POSIX.
   C4710   mention that if the variable is volatile this should be suppressed.
   C4510    mention  if  have  reference or const members provide default
   constructor   with   initializer   list.    If   intent   is  to  make
   non-default-constructable, provide private declaration only.

Paul

PS The coverage of gcc is thin, for other compilers, non-existent.
Contributions welcome as I am entirely ignorant of these compilers.

   Working on it;)
   Thanks,
   Patrick

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: [2]http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boo
st

References

   1. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/Guidelines/MaintenanceGuidelines
   2. http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost