Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-18 05:28:37
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Markus Werle
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:42 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same
> Only after intensive use we will find all the odds.
And have years of lots of users feedback to refinement/development.
> And: I'd prefer 2 boost libraries of the same kind over none.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk