Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 15:47:46
Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>> I suggest, for the case of competing libraries, that the
>> contributors are
>> supposed to review the opponent's library but to refrain from voting.
> +1 (I was already thinking the same.)
> If a competitor votes, the review manager should ignore it, of course.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk