Subject: Re: [boost] Updating the Boost Review Process Was: [GGL] Bost.Polygon (GTL) vs GGL - rationale
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-20 14:32:35
I reacted on Luke's answer yesterday but I kept thinking about this all.
> [...] I went out of my way to be positive and friendly in my response, but I was concerned that your benchmark results would kill my library's chances in review, which they very nearly did. [...]
Luke, I want to make my apologies about all those benchmarks,
explicitly. Since last day, realizing your feelings, your real feelings,
I'm convinced now that I should not have published them during your
review. I regret this, and I want to apologize now. I measured things;
however, a week ago you opened my eyes, that within a night the reverse
could be measured.
Having read your open message, I first didn't believe you, honestly, but
after your answer I started to feel the threat you must have felt. We
wanted to be open with you, convince you and invite you, very true, but
all that together was unfortunate. I did not realize that because you
stayed friendly, as you've written. But now I'm feeling very sorry about
When your review was there, I first didn't want to vote but in the end I
did. I voted mainly based on my own benchmarks. But they can be
reversed. My description was way too explicit and inappropriate. I
apologize for that too. I would wish, if that would have been possible,
to retract my no-vote and all the objections I did express.
I was surprised, and I really appreciate, that you didn't mirror that,
you voted for accepting our library, with reservations, but in an
Yesterday I wrote that we should go on and you accepted that
immediately. Thanks for that, great, and again, I'm feeling very sorry.
Best regards, Barend
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk