Re: [boost] [thread] unlock on multiple lockables

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] unlock on multiple lockables
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 09:24:11

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Vicente Botet Escriba
>> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't know if I have already requested that but ...
>>>
>>> Is there any deep reason to don't provide the equivalent of the free
>>> functions lock, try_lock
>>>
>>

Sorry everyone, I misunderstood the question.  I thought *none* of
these functions existed, and was asking why.  It's nice to see that
there is a deadlock-avoiding lock-multiple (as long as it is used
consistently!)

Tony