Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 15:17:25
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Patrick Horgan wrote:
>> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> FWIW, non-virtual destructors are the norm in Boost.
>>> I strongly dislike the idea of having a policy enabling
>>> virtual destructors.
>> Steven, could you tell me the reason for this?
> There aren't a lot of virtual function in Boost either.
> In ggl, the only virtual functions I see are in exception classes.
Another part is where virtual functions are used is extension
providing projections, however this part is/was not subject
of the review.
I can confirm no other types consist of virtual methods,
thus no virtual destructors are assumed.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk