Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] boost::lambda and math functions
From: Peter Foelsche (peter_foelsche_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 20:40:13

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [unordered] unordered_set::erase() complexity bug?"
Previous message: Helge Bahmann: "[boost] Proposal for library addition: faster signals/slots, reactor, atomics"
In reply to: Peter Foelsche: "[boost] boost::lambda and math functions"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] boost::lambda and math functions"
Reply: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] boost::lambda and math functions"

"Peter Foelsche" <peter_foelsche_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:hef6ot$dnj$1_at_ger.gmane.org...

see attached.
Is there no simpler way?
I especially dislike having to know the type of the argument.
And I would need to write one class for every math function.

Peter

text/plain attachment: Source1.cpp

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [unordered] unordered_set::erase() complexity bug?"
Previous message: Helge Bahmann: "[boost] Proposal for library addition: faster signals/slots, reactor, atomics"
In reply to: Peter Foelsche: "[boost] boost::lambda and math functions"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] boost::lambda and math functions"
Reply: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] boost::lambda and math functions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk