Re: [boost] Proposal for library addition: faster signals/slots, reactor, atomics

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for library addition: faster signals/slots, reactor, atomics
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 09:23:26

Vicente Botet Escriba wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Helge Bahmann wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everyone
>> 
>> I have written a small library providing:
>> 
>> - a (thread-safe) signal/slot implementation
>> - poll/timer/reactor implementation
>> - atomic operations modelled after the proposed C++0x standard (x86 32/64
>> bit, 
>> ppc, alpha, more if someone donates hardware; fallback implementation
>> using 
>> locks)
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>> If you are interested, I invite you to have a look at:
>> 
>> http://www.chaoticmind.net/~hcb/projects/libtscb
>> 
>> Maybe parts of the library might be interesting for Boost? In particular
>> the 
>> atomic operations could be salvaged and provide a "transitional" 
>> implementation internal to boost as an interim solution until compiler 
>> vendors catch up with C++0x, and I would also like to propose the reactor
>> as 
>> a higher-performance alternative to Boost.Asio (my signal/slot
>> implementation 
>> lacks combiners and other features provided by Boost.Signals2).
>> 
>> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> The link you give points to the documentation. Could you gibe a link to
> download the library?
> 
> 

Sorry for the noise. I see it now.

Vicente
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Proposal-for-library-addition%3A-faster-signals-slots%2C-reactor%2C-atomics-tp26488961p26496748.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.