Subject: Re: [boost] Core libraries should separated from experimentallibraries
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 12:31:58
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Christian Schladetsch wrote:
>> +1 for making it harder to add a new library to boost.
>> There are already too many libraries.
> -1 for making it even harder to add a new library to boost.
> Boost and C++ doesn't have anywhere near enough libraries.
Other languages are more popular just *because* they have libraries
that do everything, we need such things in C++ too, with the speed
that C++ provides us. You can never have too many libraries, as long
as they are well documented and categorized.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk