Subject: Re: [boost] Core libraries should separated from experimentallibraries
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 15:06:16
On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Michael Caisse wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Christian Schladetsch wrote:
>>> +1 for making it harder to add a new library to boost.
>>> There are already too many libraries.
>> -1 for making it even harder to add a new library to boost.
>> Boost and C++ doesn't have anywhere near enough libraries.
>> Robert Ramey
> +1 to Robert's -1 (o;
I've got to go with Robert here.
I just wrote a bunch of python code and used libraries to
talk to MySQL,
write CGI handlers,
parse MIME messages,
generate XML (off the top of my head).
Where are the modern C++ versions (good generic interfaces, well tested, source code available) of libraries to perform these tasks?
More libraries, please.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk