Re: [boost] [fiber] new version in vault

Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] new version in vault
From: Oliver Kowalke (k-oli_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-30 08:12:35

> Oliver, lock_guard and unique_lock are on boost namespace so no intermix
> of
> namespaces. Is there any difference between yours
> boost::fibers::lock_guard
> and boost::fibers::unique_lock and boost::lock_guard and
> boost::unique_lock?
> If no, IMO you should remove them and request the user to use the provided
> by Boost.Thread. If yes, either your mutex implementation do not model the
> Lockable concept, or the boost::lock_guard and boost::unique_lock are not
> enough generic or some feature is missing. In any case we need a clear
> answer.

I've removed the stuff from boost.fiber - thx
Oliver
-- 
Preisknaller: GMX DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.!
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02