Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamboostorgtrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-03 18:17:23
> 1. Is there a Boost library removal process, so that one can at
> least mark a library as deprecated? The duality, sort of, to the
> acceptance process.
Remove libraries? Current users of the to be removed library would be
delighted to learn that their code will no longer compile with the next
version of Boost. Deprecated libraries? Seems like a good idea, if the new
library offers a strict superset of the features of the old one. In reality
this will almost never happen.
> 2. *If* (i) MSM were part of Boost before Statechart and (ii)
> compilers could handle massive transition tables (in the order
> of a few hundred transitions), would Statechart have been
Probably not, but why is this important?
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk