Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: David Bergman (David.Bergman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-04 00:43:30
On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:20 AM, Andrew Venikov wrote:
> David Bergman wrote:
>> But the choices are usually, well, *different* ways (different notions
>> or at least highly different interfaces) of accomplishing the same
> What about map and hash_map? They try to accomplish the same thing and
> the interfaces are almost identical?
Or even std::vector and std::list for a lot of operations :-)
Yes, if the runtime characteristics is highly distinct, preferably complexity-theoretically so, there can be a use of multiple implementations. Although: even the notions at a *semi*-abstract level are different between map (tree) and hash_map (); so, I do not even think about hash_map and map the same when diving an inch below the most abstract level. So, I would venture to say that the notions are distinct at that semi-abstract level.
> I say make the user aware of different options and what the differences
> in terms of performance/scalability/usability and so on and let her
> what to use.
Makes sense. This will become quite important, as some other guys have pointed out.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk