Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-04 07:37:53
David Bergman wrote:
> How do you think it feels for new Boost users to encounter two
> libraries with virtually identical use and interface? I think
> that is a bad thing in itself, and makes Boost look less coherent.
> I.e., if these two libraries were up for review now, would we
> accept them both?
This was discussed just recently in the two geometry library reviews
(both accepted) and the majority view was that it is a good thing to
have many libraries even if they overlap.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk