Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamboostorgtrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-04 08:08:05
>> Remove libraries? Current users of the to be removed library
>> would be delighted to learn that their code will no longer compile
>> with the next version of Boost. Deprecated libraries? Seems like
>> a good idea, if the new library offers a strict superset of the
>> features of the old one. In reality this will almost never happen.
> Well, that is the case with Spirit 1 and Spirit 2, right?
Spirit 2 offers a strict superset of the Spirit 1 functionality, right? This
is not the case with MSM and Statechart.
> How do you think it feels for new Boost users to encounter two
> libraries with virtually identical use and interface?
The interface is very different and there's also difference in 2 key
features (as I've pointed out in another post).
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk