|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 16:25:13
On Dec 6, 2009, at 1:08 AM, Christophe Henry wrote:
>>> Repeating: the MSM/Statechart overlap in features and interface is quite
>>> unique to Boost.
>>
>>
>> They definitely overlap in features and also in intent, but my understanding
>> is that the interfaces are vastly different, and that's an important
>> distinguishing feature. Am I missing something?
>
> No you aren't.
Then, for the record, I would give David Bergman's opinions in this thread more weight if he would retract his claim that each has a "virtually identical … interface."
His other points seem quite valid on the face of it, but this one seems completely off target, and is likely the cause of the heated response he has received.
-- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk