Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 16:25:13
On Dec 6, 2009, at 1:08 AM, Christophe Henry wrote:
>>> Repeating: the MSM/Statechart overlap in features and interface is quite
>>> unique to Boost.
>> They definitely overlap in features and also in intent, but my understanding
>> is that the interfaces are vastly different, and that's an important
>> distinguishing feature. Am I missing something?
> No you aren't.
Then, for the record, I would give David Bergman's opinions in this thread more weight if he would retract his claim that each has a "virtually identical
His other points seem quite valid on the face of it, but this one seems completely off target, and is likely the cause of the heated response he has received.
-- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk