Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] eUML guard/action location
From: Christophe Henry (christophe.j.henry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-08 09:46:52
>Thank you for setting me straight on this. It should have dawned
>on me that they were completion transitions as described in 15.3.14.
>I have a love/hate feeling about them... I don't personally like
>the concept of leaving a state via implicit trigger. It just makes
>me feel uncomfortable. However, I also see the power they can
>afford and use them for exactly your example... stepping along
You taught me about simple states' internal transitions so let's count
it a fair trade ;-)
>Right now I'm pushing on the edges of what I'm learning from the docs
>and a little bit of playing so I can determine how to convert basic
>constructs I use a lot from the model to the implementation. Thanks
>for putting up with me.
You're welcome. I enjoy the discussion and await the harder questions
which are surely coming.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk