Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library of is_less_comparable<T, U> and others
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-08 11:30:24
> Since is_convertible_to is always implied, and any type can be converted -- using the term loosely -- to no type, "void" might not be confusing. The name used in this context could be left to reviewers to choose.
how does is_convertible_to<> handle void? ie are all types considered
convertible to void?