Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Christophe Henry (christophe.j.henry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-15 16:33:04
>Anyway, I hope that clarifies my concern is not primarily with the
>failure to compile on older gcc versions.
Yes it does and it's a good point.
>I can accept eUML as an experimental library.... Does that help?
Yes, I think it's a good term and I'll put it like this in the doc
with a word of explanation about compilers and fsm size.
>Oh - I also neglected to suggest that a better name for euml is badly needed
I like the name eUML. "Embedded UML" is really what it wants to be,
UML syntax in the code.
Besides you know by now my taste for names which sound cool ;-)
Of course, if you find some really cool name...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk