Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Strict Aliasing Warnings on Trunk
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-18 03:11:23
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Dean Michael Berris
>>>> To someone who doesn't know the
>>>> semantics of reinterpret_cast, perhaps the warning has some value, but
>>>> for the rest of us what it really says is "Warning! You have used
>>> Sure, but isn't reinterpret_cast considered bad because of the fact
>>> that there is no standard implementation of it?
>> I'm not sure what you mean. There is a standard implementation of
> Really? I thought this was implementation-defined?
Sure, but it is specified that if you reinterpret_cast from T1* to
T2*, then reinterpret_cast the resulting T2* back to T1*, you'll get
the original value (as long as T2 doesn't have stricter alignment
Reinterpret_cast is tricky but it is part of the language and it's
lame for the compiler to warn when it is used.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk