Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] quarters as new durations?
From: Thomas Lemm (Thomas.Lemm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-31 09:24:14
thank you for letting me know about your opinion on a new quarter
duration type. Given your pros and cons, I think I refrain from adding
another type to the library, especially with the simple
>>>>> const months quarters = months(3);
>> Jeff's idea of months(3) is all you need, right?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk