Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] coding conventions
From: Michael (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-03 06:23:04


Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
>>
> Behalf Of
>
>> Mateusz Loskot
>> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 9:48 PM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] coding conventions
>>
>> Michael wrote:
>>
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> here's a first patch:
>>>
>>> it was generated using the command 'svn diff > ../boost.diff"
>>>
>>> questions on the formatting of new code (conforming standards used at
>>> gdb-patches_at_[hidden]):
>>>
>>> 1) can lines exceed the 80 character limit?
>>>
>
> With the widespread use of wider screens, some Boost authors are already edging
> beyond 80 char width.
>
>
>> http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Guidelines
>>
>
> Perhaps we should relax the 80 char width recommendation? (and anyway it is only
> a recommendation? - Readability comes first?)
>
> Paul
>
> PS Using 2 space indentation reduces the risk of running over the 80 width, so
> is my preference.
>
> ---
> Paul A. Bristow
> Prizet Farmhouse
> Kendal, UK LA8 8AB
> +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204
> pbristow_at_[hidden]
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
Hi,

While we now hopefully agree on the coding guidelines, I had hoped you
don't mind me having a quick look at the ublas input/output the upcoming
few days.

Regards,
Michael




Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk