Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] trunk breakage [PATCH]
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-05 23:04:03

On 1/6/2010 2:38 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Any reason to prefer this implementation to the one currently in trunk?

You mean, aside from the fact that it is standard C++03, conforms to
Boost's coding guidelines, requires no compiler-specific workarounds,
and is unlikely to be broken on platforms that are not being actively
tested; whereas the one currently on trunk is none of those things? Not
really, no. :-P

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at