Subject: Re: [boost] [persistent] Persistent library preview
From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-08 08:07:46
if that is acceptable to your use case and other use cases you can think of
> I'll at it to the "future development" page.
> I don't think it's an essential part of such a library and necessary for
> initial version of it.
This is acceptable to my use case.
> but you seem to be experienced in implementing undo/redo so you're welcome
> to draft a public interface for this.
> the implementation would be pretty easy I think. the information that
> describes the changes made by a transaction is already available while a
> transaction is running.
I'll look into it.
Thanks for your time
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk