Subject: Re: [boost] [preprocessor]
From: âÁÇÒÁÔ áÓÁÔÒÑÎ (bagrat_assatrian_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-08 14:10:20
I told that the main difference is that it allows user to in-place compose and pass lambda expressions to a functions that accept invokable entities. What's the difference with this approach and the existing boost.preprocessor's one? The same as BOOST.MPL with and WITHOUT lambda support.
You can experiment with the features we talk about; I included lot's of stuff you to experiment.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk