Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Christophe Henry (christophe.j.henry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-11 11:34:18
>No, I won't spend "a lot more" time trying to decipher the supposedly
>hidden meaning of your post and invest the time more wisely by making
>MSM more useful.
>The link I added seems quite clear to me and anyone interested can
>make himself his own opinion by opening it.
>You did not bother bringing an argumentation disproving my claim, so I
>will simply keep it.
>As you also didn't address the more important technical part (multiple
>TU) of my answer, I will consider it accepted.
I want to apologize for the harsh language I used and the
uncharacteristic loss of patience I displayed.
I also wanted to let you know that I of course accept your explanation
as not doing it would be suspecting you of being dishonest, which I
have not been doing at any time.
I admit honestly failing to understand what is the impossibility you
claim, thus the confusion.
I think there is no interest right now for a technical discussion but
for the record, I do not accept any impossibility of any sort and the
next version of MSM will include a precise example of a multi-TU fsm
to illustrate my claim.
I wish all of you a happy, successful new year.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk