Subject: Re: [boost] [transaction] NewBoost.Transactionlibraryunderdiscussion
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-23 15:37:31
Am Friday 22 January 2010 19:55:07 schrieben Sie:
> > +1 for removing TransactionManager::bind() and ::has_active(), and make
> > its constructor throw if there already is a TransactionManager
> > +1 to support connecting/disconnecting resources to support opening one
> > database file first and then another
> I have now implemented that, with one difference:
> why even construct a basic_transaction_manager when it is a singleton and
> all of its state is mutable(connecting and disconnecting resources)?
unfortunately, the answer to this question is: because
basic_transaction_manager will have a state beyond state as soon at it
maintains a distributed transaction log.
so that part will have to be reversed, so the user can construct it as we've
discussed, using e.g. the filename for the log.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk