|
Boost : |
Subject: [boost] Thread-safe singleton pattern
From: Andrew Chinkoff (achinkoff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-25 18:49:46
I propose thread safe singleton pattern implementation
(see http://www.research.ibm.com/designpatterns/pubs/ph-jun96.txt).
I have attached "singleton.hpp" to this letter.
Below is the test program:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <singleton.hpp>
class A : public boost::Singleton<A>
{
//
// Only Singleton class can create and delete us!
//
SINGLETON_IS_MY_FRIEND;
public:
void foo(){ printf("foo!\n"); }
A(){ printf("A()\n"); }
~A(){ printf("~A()\n"); }
};
void main()
{
// It is not compiled:
//A a = A::Instance();
// That is exactly as it should be used:
A::Instance().foo();
}
Test program outputs:
A()
foo!
~A()
My question: Does Boost community think that boost::Singleton is convenient
(or successful) solution?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk