Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.utility]
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-26 17:11:18
> Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> > If you peel off the singleton aspect of singletons, you're
> > left with global
> > state and lazy initialization. A facility that supports
> > thread-safe lazy
> > initialization might be useful, but why tie it to global
> > state (which is of more dubious value)?
> Hm, good point. Perhaps there are three "levels" here:
> 1) Thread-safe, lazy initialized, general creation methods
> 2) 1 with global access
> 3) 2 with guaranteed same-instance access.
What does "global access" mean to you that isn't embodied in 1)?
As I see it, you declare an extern instance of 1) in a header and you have 2). global<T> is a template, so it could have a static member that could be initialized in a header, but then you could only have one. I'm confused.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk