Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.utility]
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-27 17:02:42
Andrew Chinkoff wrote:
> Ok, I see. I would try to explain.
[snip lots of code trying to explain "atomic"]
> ATOMIC(code) ensures that "code" will be executed
> consistently with all threads.
> "Mutex'ed code" is the part of code, that is protected with
> mutex locker.
I don't understand the difference between what you describe as ATOMIC(code) and putting "code" into a critical section controlled by a mutex.
> I assume that boost::call_once does so:
> if(ATOMIC(!flag1)) // (2)
> Locker locker;
Steven already noted that call_once ensures that one and only one thread runs the supplied functor; any contending threads block until the functor completes. That's pretty clear. If that's still not what you want to know, I'm at a loss to understand even yet.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk