Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.utility]
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-27 17:08:52
Andrew Chinkoff wrote:
> *** BEGIN EXPLANATION ***
> Let us imagine that boost::call_once has approximately this implementation
> (in pseudo code):
> call_once(function foo)
> Locker locker;
> called = true;
> foo(); (1)
called = true; has to go /after/ the call to foo.
Otherwise, this works once you add in the magic needed to
prevent the compiler and the hardware from reordering operations.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk